Pages

Wednesday, 16 October 2024

Ancestry DNA's ethnicity update makes me a different type of Scot!

There's been a curious update to Ancestry's ethnicity profiling on its DNA platform. Before the update I was shown as being 84% Scottish, with a subgroup of Northern Ireland and Southwest Scotland, which comprised of three groups - Western Northern Ireland, Fermanagh and Southwest Tyrone, and Eastern Northern Ireland and Southwestern Scotland. That did reflect my Scottish ancestry to quite a good extent, with most of my "Scottish" identity coming from Plantation stock in Ulster (Scots who migrated to Ulster from 1609), although it neglected the Gaelic quarter of my identity that is in fact Highland Scottish, from Invernessshire, Perthshire and Easter Ross.   


Switching now to the new ethnicity reading, and the Ulster Plantations have seemingly never happened. I am now shown as 80% Highland Scottish, and 20% Irish, from Ulster and Northern Ireland. Whilst I am delighted that my Highland ancestry has finally been realised, I wasn't expecting the other three quarters of my Scottish ethnicity to be swallowed up in a single area that seems to draw the Highland line from Glasgow to Dunbar!!!

And just for the craic, my wife, whose family has exclusively been drawn from Kilkenny and Tipperary in Ireland for the last 200 years, is now shown as having ancestry from all four provinces in Ireland, as well as now being 9% Scottish. Errr... no!

I was thinking Ancestry may have repeated the mistake it made a few years ago when everyone was suddenly Scottish for a few glorious weeks, but from the comments I have seen on social media it looks like a lot of people are equally confused by their new ethnicity statements.

Take one very important point to heart - the ethnicity reading should not be too closely worried about - the far more useful thing to take from Ancestry's tests is the possibility of matches with distant cousins who share DNA with you.

But fair play to you if you have shares in a kilt company just now, I suspect you'll be getting a few more enquiries from folk once again wishing to trade in their lederhosen ...!!!

Chris

Order Tracing Your Belfast Ancestors in the UK at https://bit.ly/BelfastAncestors. Also available - Tracing Your Irish Ancestors Through Land Records, Sharing Your Family History Online, Tracing Your Scottish Family History on the Internet, Tracing Your Irish Family History on the Internet (2nd ed), and Tracing Your Scottish Ancestry Through Church and State Records - to purchase, please visit https://bit.ly/ChrisPatonPSbooks. For purchase in tthe USA visit https://www.penandswordbooks.com. Further news published daily on The Scottish GENES Facebook page, on Threads at @scottishgenesblog and via Mastodon at https://mastodon.scot/@ScottishGENES.

4 comments:

  1. My Scottish percentage is now 2% - considering that my paper ancestry is 12.5% Scottish (GGF was from Dundee and any deep ancestry I can identify up there comes from Dunkeld way) this seems a little light. But the explanation says 2% could be zero, could be 12. I'd have expected to see something like "95% certain to be between X and Y", so I remain dubious. Strictly for entertainment is the 2% from Denmark, which started out coming from Sweden (accounting for my father's liking Abba 😉) then went to Germany (I doubt he had an opinion on Kraftwerk), recrossed the Baltic once to Norway (?), then back over to Denmark. I think Scandinavia would surely suffice...

    ReplyDelete
  2. I’m now 9% less Scottish and have gained 9% Iceland…..I’m thinking maybe the Scots did a layover there on their way to Ireland way back😊

    ReplyDelete
  3. I’ve gained 2%Cornish, ancient Celtic genes maybe as on paper I’m exclusively Irish/ Scottish

    ReplyDelete
  4. I, too, am confused. Ancestry and others told me for years my almost 50% Scottish heritage entirely from my maternal side was from the Lowlands (e.g. notably Ayrshire and Northumbria prior to migration to N. Ireland by many of those from Ayrshire). Now it's been reduced to 37% Scottish Highlands only, which may account for some of the Campbells and Stewarts. I'm still confused though.

    ReplyDelete